FractureAdvice.com: On-line fracture clinic

Fracture information

Home
How to find us
Directions / maps
Consultation fees
Mark Phillips' Mini CV
FAQs
Fracture Information
Acceleration of fracture healing
Deformity Correction for malunited fractures
Fracture Non Union
Osteoporosis
Post your fracture details here for online advice
Patient guestbook area
Feedback page
Medico-Legal Practice
Fracture links
My colleagues
KCH Limb Reconstruction Trust

How do fractures heal?

 

Fracture of a bone is immediately followed by bleeding into the gap. In a closed fracture (where the skin is not opened by the injury), the blood is contained.

humerus.jpg

 

The blood starts to clot within minutes and hours largely due to a protein called fibrinogen. Clotting factors (proteins) and platelets (small cells) are required. Inflammatory cells begin to arrive to ‘mop up’ the debris. Interestingly, without the inflammation process, none of the rest of this process happens (the process can be blocked by removing the genes from mice that allow production of proteins that allow this process to happen, called the cyclo-oxygenase [or COX] pathway) and fractures do not heal. Aspirin and anti-inflammatory drugs partially block this process.

 

If the fracture occurred after minor force, the bone ends will be alive and preservation of the blood supply to all parts of the surface of the fracture will be good. If the force of the fracture was high, however, there may be dead bits of bone present between the two ends and the ends of the bone may be stripped of its blood supply.

 

Within a day or two of the fracture, there is evidence of scar formation: collagen fibres begin to link the clot and the fracture ends, stiffening the fracture.

 

Initially, this scar is very weak, but gradually it becomes stronger.

 

Within the scar tissue, some bone-forming cells begin to arrive over the next few days. They divide and begin secreting proteins to ‘orchestrate’ the bone-forming process.

 

The organisation of the process becomes like a busy city centre over the next few weeks.

 

There are:

 

Cells (the people)

Blood vessels (the roads)

The matrix (the ground)

The hormonal environment (the atmosphere)

The nutrients (food supply)

 

All need to function well to optimise the repair process.

Some of the cells for this process (osteocytes) are present in the bone in pockets (lacunae). Others will come in, responding to the call of proteins released at the time of the fracture (mainly bone morphogenetic proteins, BMPs). These cells are either ready-formed bone producing cells (osteoblasts) or bone munching cells (osteoclasts), or they are primitive forms of these. Cells which could become bone cells (but could become other cells too) are circulating in the blood in small numbers (maybe 1 in 10 000 cells) and are called mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). These are not quite like stem cells you hear about in the papers. Much of the current scientific excitement about stem cells refers to ‘pluripotent’ stem cells (cells that can become almost any cell type). These come from foetal tissue normally and can be found in placental tissue and umbilical cord blood.

 

The MSCs however have already decided to be at least one type of tissue: mesenchymal tissue – that is the bit between skin on the outside, and gut on the inside. They can become fat, muscle, nerve, scar, tendon, ligament or bone.

 

In response to the BMPs, they will become bone forming cells.

 

The BMPs will also guide the cells to where they need to be (the cells climb up the concentration gradient – a process known as chemotaxis)

 

They also instruct the cells to divide more quickly, and to make the kind of proteins they become entitled to make from their DNA, once they become a bone forming cell.

 

There are many different types of BMP – probably more than 15. All appear at slightly different times and these important proteins all have slightly different jobs. We aren’t sure what these are yet. Some are more powerful than others at stimulating the bone repair process, with BMP 2 and BMP 7 seeming the most exciting at present.

 

The clever thing about the human body is that everything has a control process – a negative feedback loop. For the BMPs, antagonists have already been found: these proteins tend have silly names made up by wacky scientists – eg. noggin and gremlin. I am not making this up: scientists do this regularly! Deep in science-land there is a lot of this: one of the controlling genes in this process is called the sonic hedgehog gene for example. The proteins that take the BMP messages to the cell nucleus are called Smads: this is a mixture of Small and Mothers Against Drosophila (a play on the US anti-drunk driver campaign popular at the time of discovery of the protein, Mothers Against Drunk Drivers) – you couldn’t make this up! You get an idea of the mood in science labs…

 

The BMPs are not the only controlling proteins – there are VEGF, FGF, PDGF, ILGF, TGFbeta, and others – all growth factors, controlling parts of the repair process.

 

VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) is very important for the control of the ingrowth of blood vessels into the healing fracture – without the vessels, of course, nothing happens. No nutrients or oxygen gets to the cells and a general strike or famine prevails.

 

By the second week, the situation should be organised: the right sort of cells should be in the right places, making the right proteins.

 

The fracture site is not just one homogeneous ‘blob’. It, like the city, has a centre and suburbs.

 

In the marrow bit in the city centre, cells tend to start forming a cartilage-like substance, and the cells are cartilage-forming. In the bit under the membrane covering the bone (the periosteum), the cells are forming primitive bone already (the suburbs).  Healing bone is called callus. The bit in the centre is called the soft callus, and the bit around the edge is called the hard callus. It has to be this way because the most strength is derived from the flared out bits around the margin of the fracture (the city analogy continues!).

 

The hard callus is forming disorganised bone though, and this is called woven bone – it has none of the structure that later, remodelled bone will have. It does have the right sort of cells, matrix and vessels etc, but no structure.

 

Because the new bone is forming in the whole area of the blood clot, the new bone tends to form a hard blob in the area of the fracture. This is good from the point of view of stability – it is much stronger, sooner. But the shape will remodel later.

 

After a few weeks of maturing, the cells start to release calcium into the matrix. It forms salt crystals with phosphate in the blood and the calcium phosphate crystals give the matrix extra strength and give the fracture healing process some visibility on X rays.

 

At this point the fracture is getting very stiff. Forces seem to be important at this stage. If there is too much movement, the cells give up trying to form bone and form cartilage and a sliding surface. If there is not enough stimulus to form bone for other reasons (eg no blood vessels arriving, poor nutrition, infection present) then fibrous scar tissue may form. If the fracture does not move at all, it seems that fracture healing is very slow. If the stability is just right, bone formation gets on quite nicely. Optimum movements are microscopic.

 

It doesn’t seem to matter whether the movement is quick or slow, so long as it is not to much movement, in terms of distance (presumably tearing the repair tissue apart).

 

In fact, walking pace loading seems to be very good at stimulating fracture healing (1-2Hz).

 

Shaking the fracture a bit more quickly with ultrasound also seems to move things along more quickly (about 40% more quickly actually).

 

Electrical stimulation with a magnetic field seems to stimulate the process to a similar degree and this may be related to natural electrical fields set up when the calcium phosphate crystals are moved (the piezo-electric effect).

 

If the fracture environment is favourable, the process continues, leading to union of the fracture over the next few weeks.

Union of the fracture basically means that the fracture is stiff enough and strong enough to carry out its normal functions without causing the patient pain. This is usually a clinical diagnosis and can be made without X ray confirmation. However, in fractures where union does not occur predictably, X rays will be required to confirm union.

 

X rays at this stage often reveal immature, or incompletely formed callus. The surgeon will want to see at least one side (cortex) of the bone becoming confluent (joining up). Once union occurs in one part of the fracture, filling in of the rest almost invariably follows. Occasionally, a defect on one side takes years to fill with bone.

 

Most fractures of the upper limb are united in 6 weeks but the lower limb fractures can take 12 to 14 weeks to allow weight bearing.

 

Several factors affect the time it takes for fractures to heal.

 

Age is probably the most important factor; up to the age of 12 fractures take about half a week per year of age plus one week for upper limb fractures. Lower limb fractures take about a week per year of age plus one week.

 

After the age of 12, age is a weaker factor, but the older the patient one can expect a longer time to healing. Virtually no patients under the age of 20 will fail to heal their fracture. Failure to heal does become more common after 20 however.

 

After age comes smoking. This seems to show smokers taking about 25% longer to heal, and having a much higher likelihood of eventual failure to heal.

 

Anti-inflammatory drugs also seem to slow down healing. The effect size has not been reproduced reliably between studies, but most anti-inflammatory drugs slow healing to some extent. There is hope though: some studies suggest that stopping the drugs allows the bone to ‘catch up’. So taking them in the early phase and then stopping them as soon as pain allows may be acceptable as a compromise.

 

The ‘energy’ of the fracture is important. If the fracture was sustained during exposure to a large force, the fracture tends to have several pieces and is said to be ‘comminuted’ or complex. This often creates fragments with poor blood supply and therefore healing will take longer. Simple, low energy fractures should heal quicker.

 

The surface area has been said to be important for simple fractures. Transverse fractures take longer to heal than oblique or spiral fractures.

 

The separation of the fracture ends is also related to the time taken to heal, with distances of greater than 1 cm gaps creating a major risk of failure to heal.

 

If a fracture is ‘open’ (the skin is broken during the injury), and particularly if there is evidence of contamination, the fracture will take much longer to heal. Also, the longer the laceration in the skin, the worse the prognosis. Rupture of blood vessels requiring repair is also an indicator of reduced healing rates.

 

Gender can sometimes be related to the healing potential of certain bones: for example females are more likely to have difficulty healing upper arm (humerus) and clavicle fractures than men.

 

The part of the bone is also recognised as a factor. This is presumed to be related to blood flow to that part of the bone, but I suspect we do not understand the whole picture in this respect.

 

Certain bones are known to be trouble-makers, and in particular, certain parts of certain bones.

 

These are known as ‘fractures-at-risk’ meaning they have a high risk of needing further surgical intervention to force them to heal. This of course takes time and causes a significant delay in rehabilitation and return to normal function.

 

The most common ‘fractures at risk’ are:

 

Open tibial fractures

Closed tibial fractures

Scaphoid fractures

Humeral fractures

Neck of femur fractures (displaced, intracapsular types)

Some clavicle fractures (displaced, or comminuted or lateral end)

Talus fractures

 

In these cases it clearly makes sense to try to anticipate or be vigilant for signs of fracture healing problems and to try to do something about it as early as possible

It may also be appropriate to think about hastening the healing of all fractures. The potential benefits of this are discussed further on the acceleration of fracture healing page of this site.

 

Mr A Mark Phillips MA FRCS(Tr&Orth)